The Supreme Court of the European Union announced It is a controversial ruling allows Employers to ban display of Religious, philosophical or spiritual symbols, after an appeal by a Muslim woman wearing a barrier.
The verdict relates to a case in Belgium where a Muslim woman wearing A head covering has been placed for Training course in internal company rules forbidden expression of Religious, philosophical or political views through words or clothing.
The woman was told that she couldn’t get training because she didn’t head Coverage is allowed in the company. Then she filed a complaint alleging that she was discriminated against against on the basics of her religion.
European Court of Justice said (ECJ) in Her ruling is that religion and belief should be viewed as one foundation of Discrimination under EU law.
However, the court ruled that this ruling of terms of Work that “forbids workers to appear, through words, through clothing, or in any thing else waytheir religious or philosophical beliefs, whatever those beliefs may be, do not constitute … direct discrimination,” read a press release issued by the European Court of Justice.
“Indeed, since every person may have a religious, philosophical, or spiritual religion or belief, this ruleProvided that it is applied in a general and undifferentiated wayThere is no difference in treatment or treatment.
However, such a recruitment rules It can constitute indirect discrimination if it appears neutral terms lead The European Court of Justice said that a particular religion or belief is specifically disadvantaged.
Thursday’s ruling is not first on this is issue It confirms previous case law.
The Supreme Court of the European Union announced It is a controversial ruling allows Employers to ban display of Religious, philosophical or spiritual symbols, after an appeal by a Muslim woman wearing a barrier.
The verdict relates to a case in Belgium where a Muslim woman wearing A head covering has been placed for Training course in internal company rules forbidden expression of Religious, philosophical or political views through words or clothing.
The woman was told that she couldn’t get training because she didn’t head Coverage is allowed in the company. Then she filed a complaint alleging that she was discriminated against against on the basics of her religion.
European Court of Justice said (ECJ) in Her ruling is that religion and belief should be viewed as one foundation of Discrimination under EU law.
However, the court ruled that this ruling of terms of Work that “forbids workers to appear, through words, through clothing, or in any thing else waytheir religious or philosophical beliefs, whatever those beliefs may be, do not constitute … direct discrimination,” read a press release issued by the European Court of Justice.
“Indeed, since every person may have a religious, philosophical, or spiritual religion or belief, this ruleProvided that it is applied in a general and undifferentiated wayThere is no difference in treatment or treatment.
However, such a recruitment rules It can constitute indirect discrimination if it appears neutral terms lead The European Court of Justice said that a particular religion or belief is specifically disadvantaged.
Thursday’s ruling is not first on this is issue It confirms previous case law.